[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:03:26 -0500
You must be using a different definition of "moderated" than anyone else uses. Except for the first posting when joining the Techwr-l list, list members' submissions are posted directly to the list. There is no moderator--not Lisa and not anybody else--who has the power and responsibility to accept or reject every message before posting. According to every definition of "moderated list" that I've ever seen (and I just looked at nearly a dozen definitions found by Google, including several on the websites of listserv software vendors), that describes an unmoderated list.
From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx> To: Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx> CC: framers@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:47:12 -0500
Well, that hasn't been anywhere close to my experience on that list, Fred. I think we can agree to disagree.
On 11/22/05, Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, Art, but you are incorrect about the Techwr-l list being > "tightly moderated". It is an unmoderated list. Lisa does monitor > the list fairly closely (as did the previous list administrators) > because it has a long history of quickly veering deeply (and > often passionately) off-topic, but what she does is after-the-fact > monitoring rather than before-the-fact moderation.
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **